Re:RubyMotion Goes 2.0 And Gets OSX Support, Templates and P...
by sandoze on Thursday May 09, 2013 @04:35PM
(#5682790)
Bullet #2 is so very very wrong. Nice try. I can't speak to the first bullet.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:RubyMotion Goes 2.0 And Gets OSX Support, Templates and P...
by ics on Thursday May 09, 2013 @04:42PM
(#5682822)
Please elaborate; I have only minimal experience with ObjC and do not use Ruby in the context of native development, so any well-described counterpoints would be much appreciated.
Edit: I obv. didn't write your parent comment. What I meant was that I'm sure others in my position, having read your parent, would appreciate more elaboration from you as well. :)
Re:RubyMotion Goes 2.0 And Gets OSX Support, Templates and P...
by sandoze on Thursday May 09, 2013 @04:51PM
(#5682871)
Sorry, you're right. It was an off the cuff rebuttal with no substance. Added to the parent comment.
Re:RubyMotion Goes 2.0 And Gets OSX Support, Templates and P...
by lukeroberts1990 on Thursday May 09, 2013 @04:42PM
(#5682826)
I think he meant ruby in bullet 2