News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by CatMtKing on Thursday May 09, 2013 @03:42PM (#5682500)
Does reproducible in this context mean:

The paper did not document their steps sufficiently, so the authors were unable to reproduce the experiment.

-- or --

The paper relied on circumstantial evidence that was not well-understood enough to be reproduced.

-- or --

The authors were able to perform the experiment as documented in the paper, but were unable to reproduce the results.

or something else?

There are no comments on this comment yet.