Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible

Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by kirk21 on Thursday May 09, 2013 @10:27AM (#5680577)

The pressure on academics is indeed an issue. They have to teach, guide PhD's, research and publish (without mentioning controlling internal affairs).

On a side note. Has anyone found a good alternative for Mendeley? I heard http://bohr.launchrock.com/ is working on sth cool.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by jballanc on Thursday May 09, 2013 @11:36AM (#5680974)

Have you considered Papers? http://papersapp.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by zzkt on Friday May 10, 2013 @04:28AM (#5685198)

Have you looked at http://www.zotero.org ? it covers most of the same ground as Mendeley, browser integration is quite good and the standalone app is as good or better than Mendeley

[ Parent | on HN ]