News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by return0 on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:43AM (#5680070)
The problem is that too much emphasis is put on prestige and reputation than on actual impact of the work. Coming from a physics background I always felt that life scientists tend to be overly audacious in their claims, am I alone in this?
Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible by pesenti on Thursday May 09, 2013 @11:48AM (#5681053)
Is it only in life sciences? Remember the cold fusion and the faster than light particle fiascos?