Re:Just 11% of 53 cancer research papers were reproducible
by return0 on Thursday May 09, 2013 @08:27AM
(#5680002)
Joking aside, the authors of these studies have highlighted the low statistical power of research in a number of fields (see also http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v14/n5/abs/nrn3475.html), which is a serious issue that often leads to over-interpretation. It's as if researches willing to publish more are rushing hasty studies out the door.
It's a good thing that people can measure these things and ring the alarm
It's a good thing that people can measure these things and ring the alarm