News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by emarion on Monday May 06, 2013 @05:57AM (#5661590)
You can't 3D print the bullets. Thus I'd speculate that this development does not significantly impact the effectiveness of gun control laws nor does it accomplish the goals of the creator.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by TazeTSchnitzel on Monday May 06, 2013 @06:13AM (#5661623)
I hope so. I live in a country where I do not have to carry a gun, the vast majority of people do not carry guns, police officers rarely carry guns, it is very unlikely you'll be killed with a gun, and I'd like it to stay that way.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by reader5000 on Monday May 06, 2013 @11:37AM (#5662911)
You just don't understand freedom man.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by chiph on Monday May 06, 2013 @12:52PM (#5663310)
One thing that wasn't mentioned in the article is that he had to embed a metal block into the plastic so that the gun was detectable on an x-ray machine. This was to comply with the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

Could someone who had a printer and the downloaded file skip that part? Yes. But they could possibly be fined and jailed for up to 5 years.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-102/pdf/STATUTE-102-Pg3...

Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by chiph on Monday May 06, 2013 @04:07PM (#5664453)
Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) has issued a statement that he plans to push for an extension of the law banning undetectable firearms. The current law (100-649) will sunset in December of 2013.

> “Everyone’s seen the movie ‘In The Line of Fire,’ where one of the great bad guys, [played by] John Malkovich, labored at making a gun out of plastic and wood so it could get through metal detectors and he could assassinate the president,” US Senator Charles Schumer said yesterday.

Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by cwsteinbach on Monday May 06, 2013 @07:13PM (#5665365)
It's genuinely refreshing to have a senator who isn't embarrassed to admit that his newest legislative proposal is inspired by the plot of a Hollywood thriller.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by damoncali on Monday May 06, 2013 @04:51PM (#5664693)
Look into caseless ammunition. It has been around for at least 20 years. Then ask how far off we are.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by rorrr2 on Monday May 06, 2013 @06:20AM (#5661650)
Bullets aren't really controlled. You can buy them online or at Walmart, legally.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by lucb1e on Monday May 06, 2013 @06:36AM (#5661690)
For starters, there is no Walmart here, nor is ammunition legally obtainable as far as I know.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by omni on Monday May 06, 2013 @11:59AM (#5663022)
Which country are you in? I wasn't aware that any non-authoritarian countries had complete bans on all types of ammunition.
Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by lucb1e on Tuesday May 07, 2013 @06:12AM (#5667299)
What do you need ammunition for when you aren't allowed to have weapons?

Besides, what non-authoritarian country considers cryptography to be ammunition?

Edit: Looked it up, if you got a license (for either hunting or a shooting club) you can legally have and buy weapons and munition.

Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by well_actually on Monday May 06, 2013 @11:59AM (#5663021)
Not true. Bullets are really controlled.

Varies from state to state and even county to county. In NYC and many other places, if you're caught with bullets for a gun you aren't permitted to possess, you can be charged with felony possession of ammunition. This is particularly used against those with prior arrests and/or convictions on their record.

But, you know... I am not a lawyer.

Re:World's first 3D printed gun test fired by hga on Monday May 06, 2013 @12:34PM (#5663203)
This is only true for a few states, I'm not aware of even some of the worst like Massachusetts doing the same (e.g. there getting expended .22 LR brass stuck in the sole of your sandal is a crime punished by a mandatory one year in jail). As I recall, NY state, forget the city, makes it illegal for your spouse to use one of your handguns.

Most states, assume 40+, and most of the population, say, 2/3rds+, don't live under such insane restrictions. Looking at the top states by population, California is #1, in the middle of the 8 worst for gun owners, and I'm pretty sure doesn't do this. Don't remember Illinois doing it either. New Jersey, maybe.

To finish, the Feds allow ammo by mail order, the only restriction is the usual "Stick an ORD-M label on the package" and ship by ground. That's about as unregulated as you can get except for the usual age limit.