News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin vs. Ben Bernanke by em70 on Sunday May 05, 2013 @01:00PM (#5658979)
I have yet to see it being pointed out that none of the encryption in use for these cryptocurrencies will necessarily remain extremely hard to break for long. A good question is: what if bitcoin or something alike does effectively gain traction and one day a math breakthrough (or a computational tech one) make the crypto weak? How much wealth will be destroyed then? Who would you turn to for help? Our system is not perfect, but taking central banks out of the loop is not a way to improve it. It would be much more useful to find ways to push down financial transaction and currency exchange costs.
Re:Bitcoin vs. Ben Bernanke by Zigurd on Sunday May 05, 2013 @02:21PM (#5659205)
Bitcoin will be the least of one's worries should strong crypto, in general, get broken through some computing breakthrough.
Re:Bitcoin vs. Ben Bernanke by em70 on Monday May 06, 2013 @01:37PM (#5663591)
Nonetheless, it is one extra worry you do not want to have
Re:Bitcoin vs. Ben Bernanke by nijk on Sunday May 05, 2013 @01:18PM (#5659018)
Stealing is wealth transfer, not wealth destruction.

And it wouldn't be anonymous, so it could be investigated and relatiated.

The same argument applies to bank robberies.

Re:Bitcoin vs. Ben Bernanke by em70 on Monday May 06, 2013 @01:34PM (#5663571)
The destruction would be by the lack of trust. Since there is nothing but supply and demand considerations keeping bitcoin's value high, guess what would happen if demand were to vanish