News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Raise Our I.Q. by scott_s on Thursday April 16, 2009 @02:58PM (#565651)
And the offspring are, expect in the case of adoption, in the same socioeconomic class as the parents.
Re:How to Raise Our I.Q. by rsheridan6 on Thursday April 16, 2009 @07:46PM (#566119)
The operative phrase being "except in the case of adoption."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Twin_Family_Study#The...

Re:How to Raise Our I.Q. by byrneseyeview on Thursday April 16, 2009 @03:19PM (#565688)
I certainly hope that somebody publishes any adoption studies of twins several decades ago and several other studies replicate the results, so we'll know if you made a relevant point.
Re:How to Raise Our I.Q. by nazgulnarsil on Thursday April 16, 2009 @05:00PM (#565891)
doing a regression analysis shows that while socioeconomic factors obviously play a role, they do not account for all, or even the majority, of the difference.
Re:How to Raise Our I.Q. by Devilboy on Thursday April 16, 2009 @08:42PM (#566179)
Twin studies show that identical twins reared apart are highly similar in terms of (for example) IQ. Much more so than fraternal twins reared together (or apart for that matter)

This indicates that genetics certainly play a very important role here. It might not be PC to say so but the science is pretty clear.

Re:How to Raise Our I.Q. by tokenadult on Thursday April 16, 2009 @10:35PM (#566297)
the science is pretty clear

Actually, the science of broad heritability, which is what you are talking about here, is anything but clear. The concept of heritability (it originated with Francis Galton) is a pre-Mendelian concept, an example of the saying that a person with a hammer treats any problem as a nail.

Heritability says NOTHING about malleability of a particular trait in populations, as any professionally edited genetics textbook will remind you. And there is already plenty of empirical evidence that IQ scores, and real-world intelligent behavior outside the testing room, and rationality (which is distinct from IQ) are exquisitely sensitive to environmental influences, many of those influences being cultural or educational rather than nutritional. That's what the book under review is about: providing a large number of citations to primary research literature on the malleability of IQ and educational achievement.