Re:Making a site that can handle #1 on Hacker News
by kennywinker on Sunday April 28, 2013 @11:10PM
(#5623875)
While the sentiment is clear, I had an uncached Wordpress site on shared hosting withstand #2 or #3 (I forget where exactly it peaked). HN isn't all that huge a traffic deliverer. It's just about the quality of that traffic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Making a site that can handle #1 on Hacker News
by andrewvc on Sunday April 28, 2013 @11:14PM
(#5623885)
Agreed, I've hit the front page a number of times. There's nothing about HN that even a cheap VPS running jekyll (like I have) can't handle.
Re:Making a site that can handle #1 on Hacker News
by jmount on Sunday April 28, 2013 @11:14PM
(#5623883)
I agree. Vanilla Wordpress plus cache doesn't even sweat on HN traffic. I would guess that without cache it would still work.
Re:Making a site that can handle #1 on Hacker News
by zalew on Monday April 29, 2013 @12:13AM
(#5624030)
> HN isn't all that huge a traffic deliverer. It's just about the quality of that traffic.
what?
Re:Making a site that can handle #1 on Hacker News
by jacques_chester on Monday April 29, 2013 @12:15AM
(#5624044)
He means that the readership of HN is high value. Name recognition amongst the HN readership might reasonably be considered to increase your chances of getting a nicer job, a book deal, a Y Combinator spot, a freelance contract, an investment round etc etc.
Re:Making a site that can handle #1 on Hacker News
by kennywinker on Monday April 29, 2013 @01:50AM
(#5624321)
What jacques_chester said, except I was mostly thinking about the engagement level of the traffic. I.e. I go to HN for deep reads and to find out about cool new tools and services. When I go to reddit, for example, I'm there to lol at teh funny .jpgs.