News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA has three smartphones orbiting the earth as mini-sat... by ttrreeww on Friday April 26, 2013 @03:29PM (#5614929)
Sooo, a lot more dangerous space trash in the future?
Re:NASA has three smartphones orbiting the earth as mini-sat... by natosaichek on Friday April 26, 2013 @05:20PM (#5615585)
Cubesats are in general some of the safest / least junky spacecraft in orbit.

There are several factors that influence how much space debris a spacecraft will generate:

1. Surface area vs. density - If a spacecraft is large and has lots of floppy solar panels and things hanging off of it, it's much more likely to be involved in a collision, and if it is involved in a collision, it's more likely that it will generate secondary debris dangerous to other spacecraft.

2. Orbital lifetime - If a spacecraft is in orbit for longer, it's more likely to be involved in a collision.

Cubesats are usually very dense, with few or no deployable components. Cubesats are also typically deployed in a low orbit that has a short lifespan - less than 2 years or so.

There are of course exceptions to both of these rules, but the phonesats are not.

Re:NASA has three smartphones orbiting the earth as mini-sat... by johnabowen on Friday April 26, 2013 @06:11PM (#5615795)
Very dense = high ballistic coefficient = longer orbital lifetime

Though I generally agree that CubeSats are relatively safe / low junkyness.

In fact, most (US only maybe?) CubeSats have to demonstrate an orbital lifetime of less than 25 years to get a frequency allocated. (The FCC regulating space debris via frequency allocation is an interesting debate for another thread.)