That's feminism. You're a feminist.
Actually thats Egalitarianism, not necessarily Feminism.
dictionary.com gives me "the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men", which to my mind suggests that if someone is "all for equivalence" then equivalence for women is a subset of that, so includes feminism.
So yes, I stand corrected. Being "all for equivalence" includes feminism, but is more than feminism; the OP is a feminist, and more.
You stated you were not for equality of men and women ("I am not a feminist") but then you immediately changed your mind and said "I am all for equivalence".
You are, as I said, a feminist and more. A feminist because you are for equivalence of men and women, and more because you are for equivalence of others as well.
Using the definition I gave (which is quite literally the dictionary definition), they are. I acknowledge that many people (in the US) seem to use the word "feminist" to mean "filthy godless pinko commie liberal baby-killing anti-American" (where "liberal" has already been redefined) or some other such politically charged interpretation. That's a fantastic trick pulled by the anti-women (amongst other things) crowd who do wonders with redefining language on a daily basis.
How in the world is that man-hating? Would it be woman-hating to say "A man needs a woman like a bicycle needs a fish"?
That said, if someone says that a joke about github (or anything else) is making them uncomfortable, it's probably worth at least listening to them. Especially if they have lived a life sufficiently different from yours that their subjective experiences are likely to be somewhat distant from yours, and especially especially if they are of a demographic people judge harshly (as determined by IATs: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html
I do think rape and death threats are, at least, extremist behavior.
Nothing terrible happened at PyCon. The three people directly involved are all fine people.
I just think it's not healthy to only look at one side of the equation.
It seems like there are two distinct sides, and no neutral ground, for women's rights, and how one goes about fighting for them.
On one hand, you have sexually repressed apes perpetually abusing women and nobody bats an eye.
And on the other hand, you have clinically insane extremists who freak out over jokes about Github.
It's sad that we can't fight for what matters, which is women's rights. It's either go completely mad about it or do nothing at all.