News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The W3C's plan for DRM in HTML5 is a betrayal for all web... by shmerl on Wednesday April 24, 2013 @01:33AM (#5600033)
It's a minor issue comparing to the issue of DRM. You say - let's worry about plugins, while users will agree to use DRM anyway. I say - if user agrees to use DRM, user can as well use native plugins - such user doesn't care about security or privacy already and there is no point to drag that issue into HTML at all.

I don't think it is a minor issue at all. My biggest complaint with flash has been the security vulnerabilities, and I trust Google/Mozilla with web encryption WAY more than I do Adobe. Can you explain why you consider it to be such a minor issue?

I don't really understand why you at the same time ready to trust some balck box DRM code from Netflix or whoever. Which can do anything of this sort: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootk...

Re:The W3C's plan for DRM in HTML5 is a betrayal for all web... by cleverjake on Thursday April 25, 2013 @09:17PM (#5610956)
Their code won't have all of the power of flash and silverlight (ie my full user account on the computer). The worst case scenario is their algo's suck and I can decrypt their videos easier.