Right, excellent.
Except the first stage doesn't run out of propellant does it, because it has to LAND again. Hence my puzzlement.
I know why multi-stage rockets are used... I'm asking why this rocket needs them, since they solve a problem it doesn't have by design.
Re:SpaceX Grasshopper Flies High
by jessriedel on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @01:03PM
(#5596369)
Rockets don't have stages because they run out of propellant, they have stages so that you don't spend 99% percent of your fuel pushing engines and tanks into orbit which you don't need once you get there.
> "they have stages so that you don't spend 99% percent of your fuel pushing engines and tanks into orbit"
In fact you can kinda make a rocket that can reach orbit that doesn't have "stages" but rather jettisons engines themselves. Early Atlas rockets did this: they had one set of fuel tanks but two engines. About two minutes into the flight they would jettison one of the engines.
Are you saying it should be single-stage-to-orbit? That's currently technologically nearly impossible, even if the rocket doesn't need to land back to Earth.
Re:SpaceX Grasshopper Flies High
by nanofortnight on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @02:00PM
(#5596810)
Not as technologically impossible as you might think: http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/space_skylon.html
I really don't understand why Skylon isn't getting more coverage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multistage_rocket