News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook tries Google's WebP image format; users squawk by ersii on Monday April 22, 2013 @12:27PM (#5590160)
> Because they broke the web for their users.

No, they did not. They broke it for the people who download the image for viewing outside of their web browser.

Re:Facebook tries Google's WebP image format; users squawk by cobralibre on Monday April 22, 2013 @12:40PM (#5590242)
Rather than dwelling on the phrase "they broke the web", read it as "they broke an important use case".

Facebook is integral to the everyday lives of many ordinary people, and the lesson here is that the designers at Facebook need to think beyond the specific tech and content that they build and deliver; they need to also consider the context in which their product is used.

Re:Facebook tries Google's WebP image format; users squawk by dfxm12 on Monday April 22, 2013 @01:33PM (#5590581)
What about the context of "my page is loading too slowly" or "Facebook is using all of the data in my monthly plan"?

Some users are facing a temporary inconvenience but everyone gets an immediate & long term gain.

Re:Facebook tries Google's WebP image format; users squawk by cobralibre on Wednesday April 24, 2013 @04:22PM (#5603715)
It ought to go without saying that Facebook is trying out this new image format because they expect benefits.
Re:Facebook tries Google's WebP image format; users squawk by jfb on Monday April 22, 2013 @03:20PM (#5591241)
Not everyone: only people who are bandwidth constrained.
Re:Facebook tries Google's WebP image format; users squawk by rhizome on Monday April 22, 2013 @04:47PM (#5591676)
I imagine the use case on the Facebook side is "viewing the image on Facebook" rather than anything beyond that.