News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facial Recognition Failed in Boston Bombing by xfs on Sunday April 21, 2013 @10:26AM (#5584937)
Matching surveillance camera images is always possible no matter how bad the image quality is. The only matter is how many false positives show up.

Facial recognition algorithms always give their best matching candidates, with thresholds to skip those not quite matching ones. Your article makes it sound like no such results were produced at all, which is unlikely how recognition is supposed to work.

Re:Facial Recognition Failed in Boston Bombing by jhonovich on Monday April 22, 2013 @12:34AM (#5587787)
First of all, almost any facial surveillance system would simply reject images like those from Lord & Taylor's. The pixel density is simply too low to even attempt plus the downtilt would also likely trigger a rejection. That's how facial recognition does work in practice.

Even if the system would allow it, not only would false positives be enormous, you'd probably miss the match as well (false negative).

Re:Facial Recognition Failed in Boston Bombing by onli on Sunday April 21, 2013 @10:34AM (#5584959)
Not impossible though. Given that such software is used to steer the future efforts of the investigators, it is possible that the software does say "no match found" if the probability of a real match is too low.