Re:What-aboutery
by ecommercematt on Sunday April 12, 2009 @01:39AM
(#558207)
How does one differentiate "deflection-style 'what about' arguments" from valid "what about" arguments free from bias?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If that was a serious question and not a troll, check philosophy courses; should be some online. They have a bit of history in that discipline of logic and analyzing arguments...
Re:What-aboutery
by ecommercematt on Sunday April 12, 2009 @03:07PM
(#558763)
I wasn't trolling. I was just pointing out that it seems like a subjective distinction as a practical matter and asking if there was a way to make it less subjective in the context of online comments, argument rebuttals, etc.