Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete

Re:Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete by mitchty on Friday April 19, 2013 @07:16PM (#5579149)

And? It isn't like this is a competition.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete by Scaevolus on Friday April 19, 2013 @07:23PM (#5579161)

There's definitely a sense of friendly competition between GCC and Clang developers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete by mitchty on Friday April 19, 2013 @07:29PM (#5579181)

Perhaps, but I don't see the need for the gcc did it first responses. A simple gcc and clang both have ful c11 support now would seem more appropriate is basically all I'm trying to convey.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete by greyfade on Friday April 19, 2013 @08:13PM (#5579297)

Competition is good when it means better language support.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete by kzrdude on Saturday April 20, 2013 @09:48AM (#5581379)

and better error messages!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clang: C++11 support is now feature-complete by saalweachter on Saturday April 20, 2013 @10:16AM (#5581459)

This is totally a competition, although the bar is probably pretty low.

If Clang is feature complete, compiler and library, and GCC takes ~N years more to be feature complete, compiler and library, then Clang could win. People might say, "I'm tired of not being able to use feature X, it's been implemented in Clang for two years", drop GCC, and install Clang.

[ Parent | on HN ]