We've Open-sourced Rendr

Re:We've Open-sourced Rendr by msoad on Friday April 19, 2013 @12:56PM (#5577567)

Does this mean Rendrjs applications will run in a JavaScript disabled browser? That would be a big win!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've Open-sourced Rendr by frontendbeauty on Friday April 19, 2013 @01:02PM (#5577605)

Yep! Because links use full URLs which get intercepted by JavaScript, if JS is disabled, you can still navigate around the app, getting full HTML from the server. Of course, any client-specific code wouldn't run (slideshows, etc).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've Open-sourced Rendr by jonny_eh on Saturday April 20, 2013 @02:31AM (#5580551)

So far, this is the most convincing argument I've heard for Rendr.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've Open-sourced Rendr by bilalq on Sunday April 21, 2013 @01:28AM (#5583975)

I'm a little confused here. Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but how does that make Rendr any different from any other server-side framework that responds with HTML?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've Open-sourced Rendr by WickyNilliams on Sunday April 21, 2013 @01:23PM (#5585509)

Because you're using the same JavaScript code for rendering on either the client or the server.

[ Parent | on HN ]