Re:How Microsoft quietly built the city of the future
by pattern on Monday April 15, 2013 @12:48PM
(#5552485)
The navigation was so poorly executed that I didn't even realize there was more than one page! I admire people experimenting, but this feels like taking the idea 80% of the way there, and just kind of leaving things unrefined/unusable.
Re:How Microsoft quietly built the city of the future
by rlu on Monday April 15, 2013 @12:31PM
(#5552396)
Hm, I get a similar error when trying to download the whitepaper on the fifth page. I can change pages fine, but when I try and click on the link it does a "download microsoft" Bing search...
Re:How Microsoft quietly built the city of the future
by tempaccount9473 on Monday April 15, 2013 @12:42PM
(#5552443)
> stumbled over the navigation to the next page, which gave me this error
> I get a similar error when trying to download the whitepaper on the fifth page.
So... first time you two have used a Microsoft product then?
Well, in case you're wondering, pretty much all Miscrosoft software is a stolen design wrapped around a buggy core when first released.
And I wanted to give the article a proper chance, so I read down the page and stumbled over the navigation to the next page, which gave me this error:
"We are sorry, the page you requested cannot be found."
And then after a few seconds, that page redirected me automatically to a Bing search for this string:
"en us news stories 88acres 88 acres how microsoft quietly built the city of the future chapter 2 aspx"
At least Bing had the good sense to return the original article as the first result.