News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Home suffering from poor Google Play reviews: 48... by prostoalex on Friday April 12, 2013 @06:38PM (#5541513)
>> an application that more-or-less tucks away all of these smartphone features

That describes like 1,000+ apps with the word "launcher" in their title, and yet a lot of them are 4+ stars https://play.google.com/store/search?q=launcher&c=apps

Re:Facebook Home suffering from poor Google Play reviews: 48... by thezilch on Friday April 12, 2013 @06:57PM (#5541600)
I haven't looked through those 1k+ apps; I looked at the first few and would say you're completely wrong -- the apps don't hide the features we've come to expect of a homescreen of a smartphone. As I wrote elsewhere...

Oh well, they thought they could simply "take over" the entire, front-facing experience of the phone. They probably would have had better success trying their hand at releasing a better widget, surfacing the same experience without removing the notifications bar, apps tray, etc. Being resizable and able to coexist with other widgets (eg. 1x4 Search, 4x4 FB, 1x4 App tray) would appear to be a lot more welcoming.

Re:Facebook Home suffering from poor Google Play reviews: 48... by billnguyen on Friday April 12, 2013 @06:48PM (#5541559)
Except none of those launchers remove functionality like the Facebook launcher is doing by hiding your status bar and removing widgets.

The 4+ star rated launchers add functionality to android.

Re:Facebook Home suffering from poor Google Play reviews: 48... by notJim on Friday April 12, 2013 @08:20PM (#5541951)
What are you talking about? Launchers are just alternate home screens, the degree to which they alter functionality varies greatly.

For example, I use Nova Launcher, and when you first install it, it's entirely identical to the default launcher. Most people using my phone don't even know that it's not the default.