Re:Is Polite Disagreement Becoming Grounds For Removal From ...
by RBerenguel on Monday April 08, 2013 @10:44AM
(#5511954)
Doesn't wearing an uniform imply (or could be thought so by other passengers) she was on duty? Being seen as military personnel on duty in a commercial flight doesn't just sound really good, but of course this is mostly due to the general atmosphere of flight fear
Re:Is Polite Disagreement Becoming Grounds For Removal From ...
by DanBC on Monday April 08, 2013 @10:55AM
(#5512039)
You didn't read the link, did you? I don't blame you. I freaking hate the Daily Mail too.
> Armed Forces rules state that a serviceman or woman can wear their uniforms voluntarily from their ‘residence to place of duty, irrespective of whether they travel by public or private transport, or on foot.’
EDIT: The article has a nice blurb about the difference between US and UK views of personnel in uniform.
Re:Is Polite Disagreement Becoming Grounds For Removal From ...
by RBerenguel on Tuesday April 09, 2013 @01:46AM
(#5516640)
No, I didn't read the link for that reason :) I'm from Spain, so I didn't know e rules, but was more thinking about the passenger impressions on the aircraft.
Of all the flights I have personally been on the only time there has been a real issue of passenger safety is when the drunk who wont sit down or or demands to get off the plane mid-flight and yet they continue to make alcohol available on flights.
[1]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2290462/What-way-tre...