Re:Lisp's reputation is so bad that many people don't even t...
by 10ren on Tuesday April 07, 2009 @12:44PM
(#551219)
Some people (like esr) say the main benefit of lisp is not to use it, but to use the insights it gives into how to think about code. It may be that you already have that.
Re:Lisp's reputation is so bad that many people don't even t...
by silentbicycle on Tuesday April 07, 2009 @01:21PM
(#551285)
I agree, but if a language doesn't teach you things you can use outside of it, that's a really bad sign. This is in no way unique to Lisp.
(I've been meaning to write about things I've learned from the dozen or so languages I've at least dabbled in, but haven't had the time.)
I didn't care too much about the syntax, a good editor fixes this without a problem and it was a good opportunity to look into emacs a bit (usually, I use vim). Surfing through the chapters of practical common lisp when pretty well and understanding was not exactly hard.
However after that, I was faced with confusion. There is a boatload of lisp dialects, each with a boatload of implementations and each implementation as another boatload of libraries that do something looking similar to what other implementations libraries do without being the same or compatible. How am I supposed to select any of these without having a clue? After a few days of back and forth, I decided to close the book lisp for me, because I could not find a way through this wall of selections -- at least not without investing a lot of time. Too much time for too little benefit over python.
HTH, Tetha