Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by codygman on Saturday April 06, 2013 @03:30AM
(#5502928)
Update the Go example to use 1.1 :D
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by idupree on Saturday April 06, 2013 @03:58AM
(#5502967)
Y'know,
That GCC is six years old.[1] Go, Rust, Dart and V8 didn't even exist when it was released. Maybe update that if anything?
Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by danieldk on Saturday April 06, 2013 @04:07AM
(#5502984)
And since it's a Mac, it is probably llvm-gcc (GCC with an LLVM backend).
A colleague/friend who is developing neural network software recently switched from gcc 4.2.1 to 4.5 (which is still old) and got a 50% speed increase without touching any code.
Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by SiVal on Saturday April 06, 2013 @04:18AM
(#5503001)
That's the first thing I thought, too. I'd like to see both Go 1.1 and Go 1.0.3 for a comparison (on this benchmark). I'm hoping that before long we'll be able to count on Go being within a factor of 2 of plain C by most benchmarks.
And I'd like to see CPython 3.3 in addition to PyPy.
But it's quite interesting as is. Thanks.
Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by igouy on Saturday April 06, 2013 @08:06AM
(#5503348)
It's been just 2 days since go1.1beta1 was released, the other language implementations seem more out-of-date than that.
Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by reneky on Saturday April 06, 2013 @08:33AM
(#5503388)
There are more low-hanging performance fruits in the immature languages.
That said, of course all should be up to date.
Re:Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
by igouy on Saturday April 06, 2013 @08:48AM
(#5503418)
See danieldk's comment -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5502984