News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HTML5 Sandbox - a bad idea by bluetooth on Saturday April 06, 2013 @01:59AM (#5502781)
> For the same reason that we don't call out to JS to require HTTPS but rather use HSTS, XFO is right way to block CJ.

I think this is the best point in your argument. If you're going to half-assedly block framing (via JS, not using XFO), you will have problems. Either through sandboxed frames, or using XSSAuditor against it, it will break.

Besides this minor issue, there really is no other serious flaw with sandbox framing.

Re:HTML5 Sandbox - a bad idea by homakov on Saturday April 06, 2013 @02:09AM (#5502800)
alright, let's blame developers! :)

and regards flaws - sandbox could be more tightly coupled with Content security policy. Not a big deal, but posts look really misleading telling "put it in sandbox, well done"