As for seasteading, there have been plenty of experiments testing the theory that a tiny nation can become very rich from being a laxly-regulated, tax-free place for rich foreigners to park money. It works very well until you try to generalise the results to larger economies and end up like a certain Mediterranean tax haven with a non-state currency...
The trouble with dismissing the knowledge accumulated by those whose experiments failed is the risk of being condemned to repeat them...
Besides, your comment basically says that you don't have data to support your position, but you have a hunch, so we should just trust you on this.
Now today the question is whether the "mixed economy" which allows unlimited state intervention (which does indeed lead to Cyprus) is better than fettered government and unfettered capitalism. We're going to find out.
We have politicians who have misunderstand and politicise economics. Similar to how evolution is somehow now a liberal theory.
New Keynesian economics is not liberal or conservative. It says, in hyper-simplified form, save (conservative) in good times, and spend (liberal) in bad. Right-wing Central Europe is one of the few in recent memory to have implemented both legs. Politically conservative trade theory, about which there is consensus amongst economists, earned left-wing Paul Krugman his Nobel Prize.
Myth of the Rational Voter [1] explores issues economists have put to rest but the public refuses to accept there is consensus on. Similar to how the masses insist on perceiving "hackers".
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Myth-Rational-Voter-Democracies-Polici...