No, there's currently no neutral way.
Good judges can tell who the good writers are, but there's no currently no independent way of telling who the good judges are.
Empirically the oscillations of opinion seem to settle down after a few hundred years. Even then there are probably errors. E.g. tragedies will tend to be more highly regarded than comedies, because they seem more serious.
Re:Ayn Rand's Literature of Capitalism
by gwenhwyfaer on Saturday September 15, 2007 @01:16PM
(#54946)
Probably not, no, since one of the tests of quality is timelessness.
(This question sounds smarmy, but I ask it earnestly.)