Cgdb: a lightweight curses (terminal-based) interface to GDB

Re:Cgdb: a lightweight curses (terminal-based) interface to GDB by kleiba on Thursday April 04, 2013 @10:09AM (#5492718)

I do the occasional C++ debugging, and use gud-gdb in Emacs for that. I'm comfortable with Emacs, but I'm still a beginner when it comes to gdb.

Would there be a good reason for me to switch to cgdb?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cgdb: a lightweight curses (terminal-based) interface to GDB by fafner on Thursday April 04, 2013 @10:14AM (#5492751)

I don't think there is a reason. GUD is very powerful and integrates well within Emacs. cgdb rather seems to be designed for vi users who don't want a debug interface in their editor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cgdb: a lightweight curses (terminal-based) interface to GDB by bnegreve on Thursday April 04, 2013 @10:50AM (#5492985)

I agree with this, gud is at least as good as cgdb.

[ Parent | on HN ]