> You’ll need to convince me that “e^ipi = -1” is actually a “thought"
Then what is it?
Re:Douglas Hofstadter has a new book
by zwischenzug on Wednesday April 03, 2013 @05:36PM
(#5489311)
A statement of grammar? A picture? A string of characters?
What would a thought in print look like? And what print with any meaning at all would not "be a thought" in ordinary parlance?
> And what print with any meaning at all would not "be a thought" in ordinary parlance?
Exactly my point.
Can you think about Euler’s identity? Almost certainly. Can you think Euler’s identity? Very unclear.