Re:A Personal Statement from Iain Banks
by philwelch on Wednesday April 03, 2013 @03:19PM
(#5488388)
Do you write any comments other than to promote your blog?
Threadjacking. Bad enough in other threads, utterly without respect in this one.
None of that would have been possible without the 300, and more importantly without people like you and I believing in the goal.
On cancer: there are new ideas and promising signs if you know where to look. I'm not a fan of WILT, but I haven't see anyone mount a good claim that it won't work as advertised, which is to say no cancer, ever:
http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2011/10/accumulating-the-...
An effective cancer treatment is all about finding a commonality to cut through the enormous variation in cancer biochemistry, so I watch for signs of that with some interest. The latest possible cancer commonality is CD47, for example:
http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2013/03/more-on-cd47-as-a...
There's also the suggestion that maybe we could extract the global cellular mechanism that makes naked mole rats cancer-free, or the different global cellular mechanism that makes blind mole rats cancer-free, and safely introduce one of them into human biology. That's much more speculative, not least for the concern that what works for 20-30 years in a mole rat might not be good for 100 in a human - there are plenty of examples of things working well in rodents but not being all that applicable to people.
http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2011/03/revisiting-naked-...
http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2012/11/the-mechanism-of-...
But even without this, I think that targeted cell destruction therapies (via nanoparticles, or trained immune cells, or viruses, etc) will evolve into a robust cancer cure for near all cancers caught early enough within the next couple of decades:
http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2006/10/cancer-cells-are-...
http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2007/01/to-what-degree-is...