Why you should never ever ever have Managers in your class name

Re:Why you should never ever ever have Managers in your clas... by mkmkmmmmm on Sunday March 31, 2013 @08:52PM (#5470860)

ConnectionPool makes me think of a collection of reusable connections that I can borrow from to talk to a server without the overhead of creating an object and opening a socket, it doesn't make me think of managing at all. Maybe I am doing it wrong?

I'm just hoping for a discussion, this is an important topic for me as a developer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why you should never ever ever have Managers in your clas... by BIackSwan on Sunday March 31, 2013 @08:57PM (#5470875)

You got it right. Thats exactly what it should be doing. If you have additional requirements you might want to create another class for that requirement or rename it to something else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why you should never ever ever have Managers in your clas... by mkmkmmmmm on Monday April 01, 2013 @01:13AM (#5471575)

That seems like an incredibly appropriate class name, then. I'm glad I wasn't missing something :)

[ Parent | on HN ]