Re:Open access: The true cost of science publishing
by Xcelerate on Thursday March 28, 2013 @01:53PM
(#5456464)
It's funny that Nature is the one always publishing articles about open access like this. Why is that? I mean, I guess they'll be the last publisher to go, but still...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Open access: The true cost of science publishing
by RabbitAngstrom on Thursday March 28, 2013 @02:33PM
(#5456747)
This is my first reaction too, but then I must remember that it's free to publish in Nature (and Science, et. al.) because of their massive readership. I don't think they'll go anywhere for a long time, because people will always want a prestigious place to put their research.
Re:Open access: The true cost of science publishing
by gwern on Thursday March 28, 2013 @03:42PM
(#5457163)
It may be a combination of idealism (fostered by their status as the leading publisher, which while I haven't looked I would bet means they make a ton of money) and cold business logic that this hurts their competitors more than them.