Re:How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing
by cullenking on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:02PM
(#5444161)
Yes, but penalties do so there is a big incentive to maximize income from penalties. I was hit by this recently, by not filing a no-income return, and not certified mailing another return that was lost, but I wasn't alerted until 2 years later when they levied $4k in late fees. It used to be easy to get out of these penalties, but there are several accounts from uppers at the IRS that they have been sitting in meetings discussing cracking down on fee collection, no longer waiving fees etc.
Re:How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing
by smsm42 on Friday March 29, 2013 @01:01AM
(#5459312)
Don't oversimplify. Prosecutors also aren't pay percentages of the sentences they get, still many prosecutors are zealous to get longer sentences. Because it's their job. The job of IRS is to extract taxes, more they do, more successful they are. People like to be successful.
Re:How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing
by twoodfin on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:08PM
(#5444202)
Though IIRC, part of "paying" for PPACA (really, just to get the CBO numbers to work out) involved increasing the IRS enforcement budget on the premise that with more money they could bring in enough additional tax revenue to produce a negative net cost.
I'm not sure this is the case. IRS funding is not a static percentage of tax revenue. Sure, the tax money goes into one big pot, but IRS funding is not dependent upon the money they bring in.