News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by SwellJoe on Sunday March 24, 2013 @01:18PM (#5432699)
- Fragile

I've never had a condom break or leak in 20 years of sexual activity. I tend to think of them as pretty much unbreakable. Maybe I've luckily chosen only good quality condoms in all that time? (Mostly Durex Extra Sensitive, but I try new ones all the time, in hopes of finding something better.)

- Comes in few sizes, beyond that, you're in 'specialty shops' territory. (Really, I don't care about shapes, flavours, bells and whistles, I care that it fits!)

This is absolutely valid criticism. Fit makes a big difference in how pleasurable their use is, and also whether there is risk of the condom slipping off (and probably poor fit increases risk of breakage).

Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by kh_hk on Sunday March 24, 2013 @02:43PM (#5433019)
Let's not forget that condoms have a failure rate, given perfect use, of 2%.
Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by swombat on Sunday March 24, 2013 @04:25PM (#5433436)
I've always wondered about how they calculated that.

If they just taught people how to use a condom and then sent them off to their merry romps, and then checked how many of them got pregnant after a few months, then the statistic is highly suspicious - after all, it could just be from misuse (put it on the wrong way, then remembered how to use a condom and put it on the right way) or just omitting to use them (and then lying about it).

In this case, that would mean that the 2% statistic just indicates that 2% of the participants were not capable or willing to use a condom.

If that's not the way they did it - then how did they do it? Because beyond having every participant followed around by a man with a clipboard, I don't see any ways to reduce the chance of misuse or lying...

Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by kh_hk on Monday March 25, 2013 @06:56PM (#5440268)
Nope, the 2% is considering 'perfect use'. Now, if that involves lying (I promise! I was using a condom, and perfectly!) I can't know, but I think statistics usually involve some corrections for these cases.

The failure rate for 'typical use' (which always involves too much cases) is 15%. These statistics come from wikipedia [1], but I knew some rough numbers from sexual education at my school and were around that. For casual sex, yes, condom is the way to go (both for birth control and STDs).

That's a big bummer, because that usually means involving hormone birth control methods in stable relationships, and I hate them and the effect that can have on my partner.

I am looking forward to see the advances in male contraception [2]. But I am afraid it will be something for the next generation.

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_birth_control_met...

[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_...

Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by Retric on Sunday March 24, 2013 @08:05PM (#5434474)
I would not be surprised is some of the issue was simply continuing after the first orgasm. Ideally, you should dry yourself and then reapply, but I don't think that happens add that much.
Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by yeonhoyoon on Sunday March 24, 2013 @09:10PM (#5434705)
it's calculated as percentage of unintended pregnancy during one year of use. http://web.archive.org/web/20080531095926/http://www.contrac...
Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by Evbn on Sunday March 24, 2013 @11:23PM (#5435222)
Yeah, the failure rate is due to misuse, but that still matters.

Alcohol has an extremely low risk of death (overdose), but alcohol misuse (driving, etc) is much mor common, and that is critically important when assessing the risk.

Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by tempestn on Sunday March 24, 2013 @07:02PM (#5434216)
I've had one break exactly once over many years of use. As far as I can tell, there was nothing special about that time. So less than 2% in my case anyway, but not zero. 2% is low enough though that I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who have had zero breaks just due to randomness.
Re:Bill Gates Will Give You $100,000 to Build a Better Condom by Nursie on Sunday March 24, 2013 @05:18PM (#5433670)
I've had that particular 'uh-oh' moment on about 3 occasions. Pretty sure it was a major brand, no idea what caused the break, but it seems to be entirely possible.