News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A gentlemen's agreement by mindcrime on Friday March 22, 2013 @12:43PM (#5424023)
That is not how capitalism works. You should take advantage of every opportunity you can to get people to try your product.

What a load of bunk. Nothing about capitalism per-se prohibits a firm from having a sense of ethics, or from having principles. Promoting this way of thinking is the reason so many lefties find so much ammunition to attack capitalism.

Firms (especially privately held ones) certainly can choose to withhold from certain kinds of behaviour while competing fiercely, and succeeding, in the market.

Re:A gentlemen's agreement by samolang on Friday March 22, 2013 @01:00PM (#5424128)
You don't have to do anything unethical to take advantage of your competitors' struggles. Was it unethical for domain registrars to offer sales when Go Daddy was catching flak for supporting SOPA?

All I'm saying is capitalism works best when customers are sensitive to problems. The more alternatives they try, the more likely they try the best alternative, the more likely the best companies succeed.

Re:A gentlemen's agreement by mindcrime on Friday March 22, 2013 @01:09PM (#5424178)
Was it unethical for domain registrars to offer sales when Go Daddy was catching flak for supporting SOPA?

No, but that wasn't a "black swan" event that GoDaddy could not control. They chose to support SOPA. In my mind, that's a pretty different scenario.

All I'm saying is capitalism works best when customers are sensitive to problems. The more alternatives they try, the more likely they try the best alternative, the more likely the best companies succeed.

I basically agree with that; I just think the OP's post is pointing out a very specific edge case where a certain sort of behaviour is indicated.

Re:A gentlemen's agreement by samolang on Friday March 22, 2013 @01:18PM (#5424226)
In my mind it's a harmless crime. If you are doing something unethical then you risk turning off customers with your scummy behavior. If you have the superior product, then you are doing the customers a favor. If you have an inferior product, then the customer will simply switch products again.

I don't think a 'gentlemen's agreement' is needed.