Re:Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
by mbreese on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @10:55PM
(#5412507)
Everyone assumes that this was a big strategic decision to scrap Reader and ditch RSS. But from what I've heard, it was more of a practical decision to drop an unmaintained project because no one knew how to update it for new backend infrastructure. But I'm sure that they misjudged the importance that people put into Reader. All in all, it seems like a wasted opportunity and a massive amount of lost good will.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
by czr80 on Thursday March 21, 2013 @06:24AM
(#5414062)
That may be true as the reason, but I cannot believe they could misjudge the importance of Reader to its users - they have all the logs and know exactly what the usage is. They just decided they didn't care enough, and could accept the negative publicity.
Re:Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
by whatprojectnext on Thursday March 21, 2013 @08:47AM
(#5414625)
Maybe they did look at the logs and decided that Reader usage was low enough (at Google scale) that they did not care.
Re:Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
by mbreese on Thursday March 21, 2013 @10:05AM
(#5415069)
At the very least, by looking at raw numbers, usage probably was pretty low. But the people that used it, used it a lot. I think that they just wanted to get rid of a project that they couldn't maintain anymore and sorely misjudged how vocal the users of it would be.