Rails 3.2.13 - Performance regressions and major bugs

Re:Rails 3.2.13 - Performance regressions and major bugs by masklinn on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:02PM (#5410289)

You do know there are other Ruby frameworks than Rails, and other development environments than ASP and Ruby right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rails 3.2.13 - Performance regressions and major bugs by sergiotapia on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:04PM (#5410306)

Yes, I used to use ASP.Net MVC for pet projects, then switched to Rails - I also use CakePHP and Django for actual paying work/contracting.

But thanks for the passive aggresive comment.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rails 3.2.13 - Performance regressions and major bugs by JonnieCache on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:45PM (#5410596)

While that may be a passive aggressive comment, sinatra is bloody brilliant all the same. You can basically pretend you're writing rails code, but with a tiny fraction of the dependencies, and actual fast response times.

Sinatra, sequel and postgresql is a dream combo. I wouldn't use rails for a new project these days, I got bored of the un-navigable code a while ago. These patches and regressions are the icing on the cake.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rails 3.2.13 - Performance regressions and major bugs by masklinn on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @06:15PM (#5410801)

> Yes

Because your comment didn't exactly hint at it considering its completely binary assertion of "Rails or ASP"

> But thanks for the passive aggresive comment.

I'm very sorry you found it passive, that was not intended.

[ Parent | on HN ]