Re:Users don't like social login
by rogerbinns on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @03:31PM
(#5409597)
What is infuriating about the stackoverflow sites is that they treat each site separately so you end up with multiple logins across the "network" that you really don't care about. Then they do that annoying thing where they display the page, then detect you are "logged in", and then tell you to refresh.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That site is very good at Q&A, but UX wise it's terrible. It's as if they've only ever tested it with their own devs, and never done any real hallway or external usability testing.
I've tried to participate in their "meta" site, but the pedantic and condescending tone there is even worse than it is on the main sites.
Re:Users don't like social login
by presidentender on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @11:56PM
(#5412797)
Furthermore, Atwood seems to take the success of the platform as a ringing endorsement of all its characteristics, as evidenced by the recent commentary on user experience and the development of his forum.
Bob Martin's recent "And I'm very sorry that when you finally brute-force your way to some modicum of success that you will credit your bad behavior, and recommend it to others" has sprung unbidden into my mind once again ...
I think this is mostly to do with cookies not working cross domains (for obvious reasons).
Re:Users don't like social login
by jessaustin on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @05:38PM
(#5410533)
This seems likely. Still, with a bit of planning they could have gotten around this. Everything dealing with identity could have been served from a single domain. There probably would still have been issues, but they would have been resolvable.
Re:Users don't like social login
by TazeTSchnitzel on Thursday March 21, 2013 @04:18AM
(#5413710)
But Google manages to do this, I'm unconvinced.