News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by n09n on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @09:39AM (#5407153)
Two people propose to you with rings that cost 25k each. One ring is resellable for 20k. One is resellable for 5k. Which one do you think is more likely to renege?
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by checker on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @01:23PM (#5408721)
If a proposer reneges, then you'll own the ring:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engagement_ring#Legal_ownership

Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by n09n on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @08:26PM (#5411820)
By then it's too late. The point is not to get more out of it if things go south. The point is to make sure they don't. This is basic game theory, buddy.
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by checker on Thursday March 21, 2013 @10:03AM (#5415058)
Perhaps I should have been more verbose. The point I was trying to make is that neither proposer is more likely to renege. Since they have both given away their 25k investment, it doesn't matter to either of them what the resale value is and thus it has no impact on their decisions. Unless it's assumed that you'll be combining assets upon marriage, which I hadn't taken into account in my original post.

Since you'll have to decline one of these proposals, one of them gets their ring back. Which one are you more likely to accept? All things equal, the 20k resale ring.

Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by Nursie on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @09:48AM (#5407202)
Why would two people propose?
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by jdechko on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @03:21PM (#5409533)
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by Nursie on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @09:49PM (#5412239)
LMAO
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by transitionality on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @08:39PM (#5411893)
The one with better romantic prospects, obviously.