News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by evilduck on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @07:13PM (#5404291)
I short circuited this and married a geologist. She picked out a cheap diamond ring because diamonds are still "what goes on your wedding ring" but we only spent about $200 on it.

Now, the misstep in marrying a geologist is that she owns many other rocks worth much more.

Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by logn on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @07:57PM (#5404541)
If your wife could choose any rock for a ring (cultural expectations aside), which would it be?
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by evilduck on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @11:03PM (#5405347)
Her answer:

For an actual rock (which are classified differently than gemstones) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourmaline

and her reasoning, "Actually gains value, good ones are not common (like diamonds are), awesome variety of colors"

Also said she likes aquamarine for actual gemstones (it's beryl, same thing as emeralds), but it's not as hard as diamond and wouldn't stand up to the daily abuse as well.

She also said she'd enjoy an uncut diamond mounted in a ring, but that's probably purely the geologist in her speaking.

Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by evilduck on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @11:11PM (#5405377)
She sent me this link as an example: http://www.etsy.com/listing/85093794/on-sale-rose-cut-indico...

She's also a fan of monzinite and clear topaz.

Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by logn on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @11:59PM (#5405551)
Neat! Thank you. I've always wanted to ask a geologist this question so I'm glad I finally could.
Re:Diamonds Are Bullshit by gchpaco on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @07:40PM (#5404440)
But she probably has a better reason for owning them.