Re:Free works
by antimatter on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @04:01PM
(#5403238)
I think he means Google could've have open sourced Reader if they wanted to.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Free works
by Kylekramer on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @04:08PM
(#5403288)
I presume the underpinnings of Reader (search, caching, etc.) are so tied to Google tech that open sourcing it would either be impossible or lead to a neutered version that was useless.