Uber driver charged with raping woman in D.C.

Re:Uber driver charged with raping woman in D.C. by andrewguenther on Thursday March 14, 2013 @03:45PM (#5377234)

I think it is actually very important that Uber is mentioned. This comment explains it perfectly: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5377167

The driver was an Uber driver, the company supported him as a driver. Any event that occurs while he is doing his work as an Uber driver deserves to have Uber mentioned.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uber driver charged with raping woman in D.C. by warfangle on Thursday March 14, 2013 @06:26PM (#5378053)

Did we read the same article? The driver in question worked for Capitol Limo, not Uber. Uber was simply software that Capitol Limo used and got paid through. Capitol Limo should have been mentioned much more than Capitol Limo was. Any event that occurs while he is doing work as a Capitol Limo driver deserves to have Capitol Limo mentioned at least Capitol Limo times Capitol Limo Capitol Limo

[ Parent | on HN ]