News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by cygwin98 on Thursday March 14, 2013 @02:51PM (#5376917)
Maybe you should give Clojure a try, which is a pragmatic Lisp in my opinion. You don't have to reinvent the wheel most of the time since you have access to a vast array of Java libraries.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by chongli on Thursday March 14, 2013 @03:53PM (#5377292)
>Unfortunately Clojure is one of the few lisps without proper tail calls. (I love Clojure I just thought I should point this out in the context of the discussion).

Fortunately, thanks to Clojure being a Lisp, you can add it yourself:

https://github.com/cjfrisz/clojure-tco

Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by S4M on Thursday March 14, 2013 @05:41PM (#5377847)
Thank you for posting this! I wanted for a long time to see a concrete example of adding a feature to a Lisp language, I will study that code.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by takeoutweight on Thursday March 14, 2013 @03:48PM (#5377259)
Unfortunately Clojure is one of the few lisps without proper tail calls. (I love Clojure I just thought I should point this out in the context of the discussion).