Re:Vagrant 1.1, VMware Fusion
by bradleyland on Thursday March 14, 2013 @02:42PM
(#5376862)
But the alternatives aren't Vagrant + Fusion versus VMWare on Windows. The alternatives are Vagrant + VirtualBox versus Vagrant + VirtualBox, which is zero cost.
Re:Vagrant 1.1, VMware Fusion
by darkarmani on Friday March 15, 2013 @03:39PM
(#5382529)
I thought that price included VM Fusion -- as in for $30 more you get the provider also.
The reason is that VMware Fusion is woefully underpriced on Mac OS X systems, due to steep competition from Parallels. The equivalent on Windows is $249.
My argument is that the value you get out of something like Vagrant + VMware Fusion pays for itself in less than an hour per seat (assuming you're billing more than $79/hour). I find that to be pretty good value, rather than comparing it directly to VMware Fusion.