Re:Former TSA screener says the job does little to keep flie...
by wfunction on Sunday March 10, 2013 @05:34PM
(#5353576)
> "Can they explode quickly enough...?"
Explosion? Starting a fire isn't enough?
Re:Former TSA screener says the job does little to keep flie...
by codex on Sunday March 10, 2013 @05:47PM
(#5353629)
Given that the TSA allows common lighters and matches to be taken on board, apparently not. I think aircraft cabins are designed to be "fire resistant" (for obvious reasons) though I'd be surprised if they were fireproof.
Re:Former TSA screener says the job does little to keep flie...
by wfunction on Monday March 11, 2013 @01:03AM
(#5355000)
But then why don't they allow water bottles? Is a flammable liquid worse than a flammable solid like Lithium?
Re:Former TSA screener says the job does little to keep flie...
by taligent on Sunday March 10, 2013 @06:12PM
(#5353735)
The entire plane interior is fire-retardant and there are lots of extinguishers around.
However, the real reason one can bring a laptop battery on a plane is because no terrorist has tried to use it yet. They would probably need multiple batteries: after the "shoe bomber" attack, the government determined that as little as 50g of PETN could bring down a plane, which is equivalent to 80+g of TNT, which is four iPad 2 batteries.
Even then, it would be necessary to deliver that energy in a very small amount of time, which may not be possible rapidly enough with lithium-ion; they can burn, but can they explode quickly enough, with all of their energy? The TSA aays they have studied the issue, and the answer is no [1], they "cannot be used as an explosive and are not a security threat in personal carry-on quantities."
[1] http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2010-...