News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I created Comic Sans by lloeki on Sunday March 10, 2013 @06:40AM (#5351374)
I found the last example pretty convincing: I did not recognise Chalkboard, and the first part seemed readable to me to the point I said myself "Well, Comic Sans is not so bad finally"... and then the last line instantly jumped at me due to kerning and baseline. Comic Sans glyphs seem to each stand on their own, unable to keep themselves together to form a word. Chalkboard is far from perfect (see k-e kern) but it is way more readable, even for small text or stand-alone words.

The case against Comic Sans in undue context is due to the funny glyphs, while the case against Comic Sans vs other comic fonts is due not to the glyphs but to the whitespace around them.

Re:Why I created Comic Sans by coldtea on Sunday March 10, 2013 @08:01AM (#5351547)
>Comic Sans glyphs seem to each stand on their own, unable to keep themselves together to form a word. The case against Comic Sans in undue context is due to the funny glyphs, while the case against Comic Sans vs other comic fonts is due not to the glyphs but to the whitespace around them.

This whitespace and keming problems though might add to the naive appeal of the font. Like, for example, bad perspective and distorted proportions make a drawing more child-like.

Re:Why I created Comic Sans by SourPatch on Sunday March 10, 2013 @07:49PM (#5354129)
> keming

Is that a typographical pun?

Re:Why I created Comic Sans by qu4z-2 on Tuesday March 12, 2013 @12:49AM (#5360251)
I'm not sure if it's technically a pun, but it's definitely a typographical joke.
Re:Why I created Comic Sans by lloeki on Sunday March 10, 2013 @12:20PM (#5352420)
Absolutely. This is most probably wanted in the second graphic example, where the lo-fi aspect and the collage of pictures from different sources would make any form of rigor look uncanny.