Re:The Quiet Coup: IMF advice on the US economy
by asmithmd1 on Friday March 27, 2009 @11:02AM
(#535153)
exactly right. And the system will be the same as before - nothing will have been done to address the heart of the problem - banks that are "too big to fail".
Anything that is too big to fail is just too big.
We have successfully broken-up companies that were too big before - AT&T comes to mind. Do you think we would have an open internet if one company controlled all access to long distance communication like AT&T did before 1984? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_System_divestiture
Re:The Quiet Coup: IMF advice on the US economy
by randallsquared on Friday March 27, 2009 @12:59PM
(#535370)
Entities that are that big have big lobbies. Big lobbies give effective control of governing bodies (at least, in their limited scope); this is known as regulatory capture. AT&T was broken up by judge, not by Congress, so it is not a good counterexample.
Re:The Quiet Coup: IMF advice on the US economy
by silentOpen on Friday March 27, 2009 @10:01PM
(#536062)
I don't think the parent cares how AT&T was broken up.
Why not break up financial institutions through the judiciary? Oh, because the anti-trust laws are crippled...
Then the fed will raise rates to kill inflation, economic growth will slow down to a crawl and we'll begin paying off our debts.
This will last 10 to 20, just like Japan.