> you don't seem to think your site falls into the "if
  > you're not paying for it, you're the product" bucket.
  > [...]
  > People aren't paying for your product, and so you are
  > making money by serving them ads. By the nature of it,
  > any ad-supported site falls into that bucket. You require
  > more user impressions/eye balls and that is what you are
  > "selling" to advertisers/Google. This is not inherently
  > evil, and I don't think one needs to prey on their users
  > to leverage advertising.

Saying that users are "the product" implies a predatory relationship. Predatory relationships are considered evil (or at minimum extremely undesirable) when the prey are human beings.