News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Create a Mind - Book Review by duaneb on Wednesday March 06, 2013 @11:16AM (#5331875)
Pattern recognition may be the main operating mechanism of the brain, but there's still much more to the brain than that: the consciousness problem is not solved or even really addressed at all, let alone thought and emotion and meaning: perhaps much of language is pattern recognition of language, but when we identify e.g. "moon" as a word, what does it map to? Pattern recognition also doesn't account for memory, for motivation, for intent and desire.

And besides, it's not like this is news to anyone. Psychology & Neuroscience literature have known pattern recognition is an integral part of how the brain works for decades now. If it were the secret ingredient to the human brain, someone would have written about it far before Ray Kurzweil did.

And it seems like everyone (including Kurzweil) forgot, pattern recognition is not exactly an easy thing to harness (the brain is far superior while consuming less power), so even if pattern recognition is THE SECRET to human intelligence, it doesn't really get us much closer to understanding the brain.

Re:How to Create a Mind - Book Review by jlgreco on Wednesday March 06, 2013 @12:10PM (#5332224)
In a system that can learn to recognize new patterns, learn to recognize new patterns of patterns, and can associate new patterns with already known patterns, how is memory unexplained?
Re:How to Create a Mind - Book Review by duaneb on Wednesday March 06, 2013 @06:26PM (#5334777)
Well sure, if you take memory for granted then yes, it is already explained.
Re:How to Create a Mind - Book Review by jlgreco on Wednesday March 06, 2013 @07:20PM (#5335029)
What do you mean? In this model "memory" (as in, the ability to remember things you have learned, seen, thought, or otherwise experienced) is emergent from the ability to form new pattern recognizers... The ability to form new pattern recognizers is not itself built on this "memory".

Do you mean that you are questioning the ability to form new pattern detectors? Do you think that isn't done, or do you just think the mechanism behind how that happens is inadequately explained?