Re:Gnome cofounder: Desktop Linux is a Chernobyl of Fail
by michaelwww on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @11:42PM
(#5329360)
"Linux just never managed to cross the desktop chasm," he concludes [Xamarin CTO Miguel de Icaza]. Surely he doesn't consider Ubuntu a failure on the desktop. Sounds like FUD to me now that he has ramped up his commercial interests.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gnome cofounder: Desktop Linux is a Chernobyl of Fail
by dylangs1030 on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @11:46PM
(#5329375)
That's complicated. In one sense Ubuntu has not failed because of how user-friendly it is. It certainly is the flagship distribution nowadays.
But it's not a success in the context mentioned in the article. It's simply not as easy to use as a Mac environment.
Re:Gnome cofounder: Desktop Linux is a Chernobyl of Fail
by michaelwww on Wednesday March 06, 2013 @12:02AM
(#5329444)
But he concludes "Linux just never managed to cross the desktop chasm." Direct quote in conclusion. That's a far cry from saying Ubuntu is not as easy to use as a Mac.
Re:Gnome cofounder: Desktop Linux is a Chernobyl of Fail
by dylangs1030 on Thursday March 07, 2013 @07:04PM
(#5341272)
Do you find Ubuntu as easy to use as a Mac?
Re:Gnome cofounder: Desktop Linux is a Chernobyl of Fail
by michaelwww on Monday March 11, 2013 @01:08PM
(#5358081)
No. But it did manage to cross "the desktop chasm" and it is usable http://www.edubuntu.org/about