Which is convenient, as then I feel less guilty about the issues I don't have time to triage, less alone fix. You don't think I personally care if you use KDE or not I hope... I contribute where I can, as time becomes available. If people find that useful, that's wonderful. If people don't find that useful, that's fine too.
I've heard from many people who have found useful those things I've found time to implement, so I'll keep plugging along for now.
As it turns out though, there actually is a build farm/continuous integration infrastructure that our wonderful sysadmins have setup for KDE by now: http://build.kde.org/
But CI isn't useful unless it results in actionable information, and it still requires developer action to make the fixes. We're accepting patches...
If you're saying OpenBSD users are in general pickier about what software they install based on what practices are used to develop that software I'd certainly believe it. I've certainly done no studies myself to figure out why there are so few bug reports so I can't say any one reason is better than another.
And NetBSD users, and minix users, etc, etc. That's exactly what I was saying.